Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes
Taxes can be distinguished by the impact they have on the allocation of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind of tax that applies the same relative requirement on all taxpayers—i.e., in the case where tax liability and income increase in relative scale. A progressive tax is characterized by a larger than proportional rise in the tax onus in regard to the rise in income, and a regressive tax is recognised by a less than proportional growth in the comparative onus. Thus, progressive taxes are regarded as taking away a lack of equality in income distribution, but regressive taxes might have the effect of increasing these inequalities.
The taxes that are usually believed to be progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are declarably progressive, however, may become less so within the upper-income demographic—particularly if a taxpayer is able to lessen his tax base by nominating deductions or by leaving out particular income elements from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates which are applied to lower-income groups could also be more progressive if such personal exemptions are claimed.
Income measured over the period of a given year might not absolutely provide the most suitable measure of taxpaying ability. For example, transitory growth in income may be saved, and within temporary declines in income a taxpayer could elect to provide for consumption by taking from savings. So, if taxation is regarded along with “permanent income,” it can be less regressive (or more progressive) than if it is made comparable with annual income.
Sales taxes and excises (save on luxuries) are usually regressive, because the spread of one’s income consumed or spent on specific goods lessens as the level of personal income is raised. Poll taxes (aka head taxes), levied as a set amount per capita, obviously are regressive.
It is difficult to determine corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, principally because of uncertainty around the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of determining who bears the tax burden lays crucially on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being considered.
In analysing the economic effect of taxation, it is important to differentiate between differing concepts of tax rates. The statutory rates will be specified in law; commonly these are marginal rates, but occasionally they are mean rates. Marginal income tax rates signify the fraction of incremental income demanded by taxation when income increases by one dollar. Ergo, if tax onus grows by 45 cents when income grows by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax legislation generally contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that rise as income increases. Careful analysis of marginal tax rates must regard provisions in addition to the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) reduces by 20 cents for each one-dollar growth in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points higher than nominated within the statutory rates. Since marginal rates display how after-tax income changes in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the relevant ones for appraising incentive effects of taxation. It is even more difficult to realise the marginal effective tax rate to apply to income from business and capital, because it may rely on such considerations as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem holds that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is nil under a consumption-based tax.
Average income tax rates indicate the percentage of total income that is taken in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is necessary for assessing the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates commonly grow with income, both because personal allowances are granted for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; on the other hand, preferential treatment of income received for the most part by high-income households might swamp these effects, allowing regressivity, as signified by average tax rates that decline as income grows.
For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.
Sphere: Related Content