Proportional, Progressive, and Regressive taxes
Taxes are distinguished by the effect they have on the placement of income and wealth. A proportional tax is the kind of tax that imposes the same relative onus on all the taxpayers—i.e., when tax liability and income increase in the same levels. A progressive tax is recognised by a more than proportional growth in the tax liability in regard to the growth in income, and a regressive tax is characterizable by a less than proportional increase in the relative onus. Thus, progressive taxes are seen as taking away inequity in income distribution, whereas regressive taxes are believed to have the result of an increase in these inequalities.
The taxes that are often considered progressive include individual income taxes and estate taxes. Income taxes that are declarably progressive, however, can become less so in the upper-income group—especially if a taxpayer is able to lessen his tax base by declaring deductions or by taking some certain income parts from his taxable income. Proportional tax rates which are applied to lower-income groups can also be more progressive if such personal exemptions are made.
Income measured over the period of a given year might not necessarily come up with the most accurate measure of taxpaying status. For example, transitory rises in income might be saved, and during temporary declines in income a taxpayer may elect to provide for consumption by decreasing savings. Therefore, if taxation is held in comparison with “permanent income,” it should be less regressive (or more progressive) than if it is made comparable with annual income.
Sales taxes and excises (except those on luxuries) tend to be regressive, because the portion of personal income consumed or spent for a specific good lessens as the rate of personal income is raised. Poll taxes (also known as head taxes), nominated as a standard amount per capita, patently are regressive.
It is hard to term corporate income taxes and taxes on business as progressive, regressive, or proportionate, principally because of a lack of certainty about the ability of businesses to shift their tax expenses (see below Shifting and incidence). This difficulty of deciding who bears the tax burden rests fundamentally on whether a national or a subnational (that is, provincial or state) tax is being debated.
In assessing the economic purpose of taxation, it is necessary to differentiate between several concepts of tax rates. The statutory rates are specified in law; commonly these are marginal rates, but for some cases they are average rates. Marginal income tax rates signify the fraction of incremental income taken by taxation when income rises by one dollar. Hence, if tax liability increases by 45 cents when income increases by one dollar, the marginal tax rate is 45 percent. Income tax regulations generally contain graduated marginal rates—i.e., rates that increase as income grows. Careful analysis of marginal tax rates must regard provisions apart from the formal statutory rate structure. If, for example, a particular tax credit (reduction in tax) lessens by 20 cents for each one-dollar increase in income, the marginal rate is 20 percentage points higher than indicated within the statutory rates. Since marginal rates specify how after-tax income moves in response to changes in before-tax income, they are the important ones for regarding incentive effects of taxation. It is even more complicated to nominate the marginal effective tax rate applied to income from business and capital, as it may rely on factors such as the structure of depreciation allowances, the deductibility of interest, and the provisions for inflation adjustment. A basic economic theorem grants that the marginal effective tax rate in income from capital is zero under a consumption-based tax.
Average income tax rates show the part of total income that is demanded in taxation. The pattern of average rates is the one that is necessary for judging the distributional equity of taxation. Under a progressive income tax the average income tax rate grows with income. Average income tax rates usually rise with income, both because personal allowances are provided for the taxpayer and dependents and also due to that marginal tax rates are graduated; on the other hand, preferential treatment of income received for the most part by high-income households can dampen these effects, allowing regressivity, as shown by average tax rates that fall as income increases.
For MYOB Brisbane expert advice, contact Stone Consulting today. Stone Consulting also runs MYOB training in Brisbane.
Sphere: Related ContentComments
Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!